Wednesday, December 5, 2012

A New Eden


 I recently watched a segment of “God in America” called “A New Eden” that discusses the problems that the US encountered with Faith in its infancy. I think it’s safe to say that in this modern day most American people believe in the separation of church and state, and that our country was never founded on a basis of faith, or at least one particular faith. However this was not the case, America’s faith at one point played a massive role in its cultural identity.

               During the 17th century, the most powerful church in North America was the Anglican Church. It was state sponsored and was maintained by an elite class of individuals, they maintained a tight grip on their faithful and made efforts to prevent other sects of Christianity (or any religion) from coming in. However, history has taught us that when there is an abusive ideology that benefits a small elite, there is likely to be an ideology that comes along to challenge it. In this situation that would be baptism, which declared that everyone had the responsibility to go out and find god for themselves, with or without the church. This of course didn’t sit right with the Anglicans, and they tried to limit the locations in which Baptists where permitted to speak. This is ultimately what gives birth to the discussion of liberty and freedom of religion. Thomas Jefferson would take up the Baptist cause to ensure that religious freedom would become a key American value. What was even more interesting was the fact that he himself did not support the Baptists religious message but rather there right to speak their message freely without opposition from the state. This was surprising to me because I typically thought of Jefferson as an anti-religious intellectual, be he was intensely spiritual, and he even created his own version of the gospels. That being said, he believed that all these ideals should be free to compete for the approval of the common man. We see that Jefferson wanted to create a completely new kind of national identity, were we weren’t united by a religion or ethnicity, but rather the belief in individual rights and freedoms. Thomas’s efforts ultimately made freedom of religion of America’s key values, but this left a “spiritual gap” in the country now that it was without a state religion. Less and less American’s took an interest in spiritual values after the revolutionary war. People became conflicted about what religion they should follow. Out of this “spiritual gap”, Protestantism would rise to become the major religion in America and it eventually began to become a part of America’s maturing cultural identity. Protestantism was even taught in public schools, and it came to be associated with the progress that America was making. However this led to conflict because now that America was a nation where all religion was “legal”, people from Europe came in droves to escape religious intolerance in their home countries. One of these places was Ireland, which had a Catholic majority ruled by a Protestant minority at the time. Needless to say that there was some intense conflict between the new catholic population and the protestant population in the US. Many Americans declared that Catholicism was against the ideals of liberty and civil rights believing that their loyalty was to Da Vatican. A lone Catholic priest John Hughes fought the state to deny Protestant teachings in public schools and eventually succeed. This time period in American history can be described as a culture war or culture crisis in which it was conflicted with its founding ideals of freedom of religion, and its newly acquired protestant identity. 

               I personally like culture wars very much because they give as an opportunity to observe how culture interact with one another, which is always interesting for me, so needless to say I really like this documentary. This particular culture war shows us some interesting things like how just because a country is tolerant by law doesn’t mean the public is tolerant of foreign beliefs and customs. It also shows us just how much of a new idea this was at the time. This idea of religious freedom was nowhere to be found in the rest of the developed world at the time, and the reaction to it was very diverse because this was uncharted territory, no one really knew if any religion could sustain itself without state support. But I think the main point this documentary brings up is America’s cultural identity. When America was founded many theorized it would slowly evolve into an aristocracy like Britain, and thus enforce a national religion, but this wasn’t the case at all (in fact they became more and more like us over time) this was the birth of something completely new. The idea that people could be held together by national ideals as opposed to a state religion was ground breaking. But as a result there was a tremendous conflict to discover a completely new cultural identity.      

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Remote Control War


I recently watched a scary documentary on automated weapons called “Remote Control War”. It goes into some of the scary new issues that we are facing today with automated weapons, and issues we could (will) be facing in the future as the technology continues to adapt.

               Ever since the gulf war, the US has been using drones (UAVs) in the field for reconnaissance and scouting. However today in the modern era there are more unmanned aircraft in the US military then manned aircraft. Needless there are several advantages to having an unmanned system compared to a manned system, such has more flexible design opportunities, being one third of the cost, no human limitations, and keeping a solider out of harm’s way. However there are a few ethical issues that need to be addressed. Armed UAVs give soldiers the ability to hunt and kill men half way around the world from the comfortable post in a US airbase. Many people complain about the ethics of this because it makes killing to easy; however the military has assured them that a human being will always make the call on whether or not to kill. This probably isn’t true due to the fact that the ultimate objective of the unmanned technicians is to develop a swarm of drones that operate on sea, land, and air that can operate without a human commander. So it’s fair to say that the more efficient drones become, it will be more difficult to keep a man in the loop. Another issue is that there are no rules or regulations when it comes to the operations of military drones in the international community. It might also surprise you to know that most US unmanned drone strike aren’t made by the US military at all. The US military is proud to have a set of rules and regulation on the engagement of drones in the field. Most drone attacks are made by the CIA which is not a US military organization and thus doesn’t have these rules and regulations. The CIA has conducted countless UAV bomb strikes all over the Middle East and as killed countless insurgents and citizens alike. They use drones because clearly the use of soldiers or manned aircraft would be an act of war against the country they entered. However there are no rules yet in the UN community to deal with UAV fatalities, or accountability. This gives the CIA the ability to “write the book as they go along” and no one can really slow them down unless other major powers begin to oppose the use of drones, which is unlikely because they are probably planning on developing them as well.

               I would like to consider drones to be the future of western imperialism. They give a free ticket to attack and kill whatever they want and no one can stop them because no one can come to an agreement on how they should be used and who should be held accountable for the results. These things will change the face of war forever because they represent a new means to wage it. What really is the scary fact as to why unmanned weapons are becoming more and more popular is because the cost of developing, creating, and fielding manned systems is skyrocketing while the price of doing the same with unmanned systems is falling like a rock. This means that it could be wide spread and be used by any country with the money to buy them. Imagine if dictatorships around the world were able to purchase small armies of heartless, merciless machines to keep his people in line. Wide spread use of unmanned weapons could lead to humanitarian atrocities like genocide.

Sunday, November 4, 2012

King Leopold's Ghost


King Leopold’s ghost is a great documentary on Belgiums imperial conquest of Africa, and goes into detail about the conquered territory which is now the democratic republic of Congo. The documentary reveals horrifying images of a conquest that slaughtered millions and left a country horribly scarred.

               According to the documentary, King Leopold the II inherited a Belgium that was striving to get ahead. It was one of the few European countries that was not a colonial power. So he set his eyes on Africa. He sent men to get as much land as they could “legally acquire”. They did this by having the local chiefs sign away their land with “treaties”. However these illiterate chiefs had no idea that they were signing away their own land. Leopold then sent military forces to seize his territory, and he induced what can only be described as slave labor. He had his workers mine gold and other valuable minerals, use their own bodies to extract rubber by peeling it off their bodies (which was extremely painful), and if they didn’t do as they were told they would be punished severely. They would be denied food and water, their family members would be taken hostages, or they would have their limbs severed. This slave labor allowed merchants to sell certain goods at a profit as high as 700%, and Leopold took full advantage of this. By the time of his death he was sitting on one of the largest fortunes in all of Europe, which was worth roughly 1.1 billion dollars. The death toll of these events rests between five to ten million people.

               This is an excellent example of European imperialism in all its glory. All these horrible acts where justified with the same meta-scientific, racial experience that evolved to justify things like this all over the world, Including all of Africa, Asia, South America, and the middle east. All of these places still carry deep social, cultural, and economic scars inflicted by European economic interests. Imperialism still continues today, it’s simply changed. The tactics have changed, the materials have changed, but it’s still here. The super powers still go out of their way to ensure that their economic interests are met.      

Thursday, September 27, 2012

A Christian look at the Westboro Baptist Church

My name is Dylan Kern and I have accepted Jesus Christ as my personal savior. I have also just finished watching Louis Theroux’s shocking documentary, “Most Hated Family in America”, and I could honestly search my entire life and not find a more horrific, terrible, and just awful misinterpretation of the teachings of Jesus Christ. Their actions show just how much one can misinterpret EVERYTHING the bible is based on.
            For those of you who don’t know, the Westboro Church is a fire and brimstone church that is composed of a single family. They are convinced that everyone in America (probaly the the entire world), except their family, is going to hell because certain parts accept homosexuality. These people are also infamous for picket the funerals of dead solders (god bless them and their families) with the most insulting signs I can imagine. They claim that all soldiers who die for this country are going to hell for dyeing in defense of a “fag nation”. They also are threatening to picket the funerals of the terrible batman shootings, and funeral of Sage Stallone. If anyone doesn’t believe me just go on YouTube and type in Westboro Baptist Church (I dare you). Westboro even trains their children at extremely young ages to become hateful protesters. In fact, another video exposed a seven year old child, saying hate slurs. They also preach that the end is coming, judgment day is upon us and that all the horrible events that are transpiring around the world are leading to Armageddon. What freaks me out the most though is that save actually find some sick joy in the idea that we're going to hell, the find pleasure in the idea of the whole world and all its inhabitants burning.
            Ok, now let’s take a close look at some of these ideals to see just how hypocritical they are. First off, no one can predict the judgment day Matthew 24:36 “No one knows the day or the hour”, if you have any doubt about that, just ask Harold Camping. They are assuming that we the inhabitants of earth have angered god to the point where he is actually going to extract his righteous wrath upon us, and this is what they preach. Now that being said, as a Christian I believe that we the human race are in fact worthy of the righteous wrath of god and that he, at one point, had every right to smite us from the earth. However the key and most sacred belief in the Christian faith is that Jesus took upon himself all our sin on the cross and the wrath of god was satisfied with his sacrifice. That is what I choose to believe as a Christian, and this is what pisses me off so much about this so called "church". If everybody in the entire world but them is going to hell, then Jesus failed, and now his father's wrath is coming to kill us all. The whole point of Christianity is that Jesus suffered in our place and because of that, we get to keep living our lives and are given a chance to repent, preach to others, and teach them the love of Jesus. These idiots have no intention of wining souls over to Christ, WHICH IS A BASIC AND IMPORTANT DUTY OF ALL CHRISTIANS!!! The "Great Commission" Matthew 28:18-20
Then Jesus came to them and said, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age."
   
            The point is that these people go against EVERYTHING Christianity is based on. They do all Christians a disservice by making us look insane and it, and one day they'll have to answer to god for their hypocrisy.